By Walter Broeckx
This article is part of the series of the Referee Review 2013. You can find links to earlier articles on the bottom of this article.
After having dealt with the different teams and after having examined all the refs and this leading to the best ref of the season according to the views of our referee reviewers we now will bring you something that will be an easy manual to see who is good or bad for a team.
We bring you this so that from now on if you see that a particular team is playing with a particular ref in charge you can see in a blink of an eye if this ref has a bad or a good history with that team. At least in the season 2012/2013. And if all goes well we will even try to add the bias from the season before in to each article. And that way you can see possible recurrent events.
The point is that some referee performances can be a one off. But if a ref has the same bias against a team over time it might show something more. If a ref of course has a big bias in favour of a team it also is saying something about that ref.
A little word of explanation about the graphics you will see. The ultimate referee performance, if ever achieved, would show a bias score (which is based on the wrong decisions) of around zero. Alas you will find very few such scores in the total series but one can always hope. The zero line will be the middle line of each graphic.
If a ref has positive bias score for the team involved you will see a name (of the ref) and a green line and a number. The bias number for that ref.
On the other hand if the ref had a negative bias you will see again a name but then with a red line and a number. The negative bias score for that ref.
The longer the line the higher the number and the higher that bias has been from the ref. Short lines are better and would be nicer for all. I also included a little table in the graphic just with the names and with a red or green label in case you want to take a quick look at the names on their own.
So here we go with West Ham United.
So in this table we see that 4 refs had a negative bias. The worst one seems to be Mike Dean. He sure doesn’t seem to like London clubs in general one could say. And the same could be said about Anthony Taylor with a big negative bias.
We also have two refs with a rather small negative bias with Mark Clattenburg and Neil Swarbrick. That is the way we want to see it. I mean the small part, not the negative bias.
On the other hand rather a lot of refs have a positive bias in favour of West Ham last season. Mason and Marinner can be called relatively small (too big to my liking still) but from then on it looks nothing but good things coming from the referees Webb, Oliver, Foy, Atkinson and certainly Phil Dowd. they all seem to have something going for WHU.
I would now have liked to add the results of West Ham of last season but for some strange reason they are not available for me for the moment. When I can find them I will add them of course. But for the moment I cannot find them.
Maybe they have gone lost in one of those cyber attacks we had to face over the last year